<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Browns in Tampa Next February</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dawgpounddaily.com/2008/02/13/the-browns-in-tampa-next-february/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dawgpounddaily.com/2008/02/13/the-browns-in-tampa-next-february/</link>
	<description>A Cleveland Browns Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 15:05:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: stevedimatteo</title>
		<link>http://dawgpounddaily.com/2008/02/13/the-browns-in-tampa-next-february/comment-page-1/#comment-223</link>
		<dc:creator>stevedimatteo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 04:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dawgpounddaily.com/2008/02/13/the-browns-in-tampa-next-february/#comment-223</guid>
		<description>I agree - I thought this was a ridiculous &quot;article,&quot; if you want to call it that.&#160; It was essentially just a mess of contradiction and vague projections, like the Bengals being able to make the Super Bowl.&#160; And what great insight to say the Browns simply need more defense.&#160; Why aren&#039;t we getting paid to only say that?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Say the Vikings did land Derek Anderson and drafted a WR ready to make an impact.&#160; I&#039;d have half a mind to start predicting a Super Bowl.&#160; The Bengals are a complete mess and, while we&#039;re at it, the Ravens are as well.&#160; And I will revel in every second of their misery.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree &#8211; I thought this was a ridiculous &quot;article,&quot; if you want to call it that.&nbsp; It was essentially just a mess of contradiction and vague projections, like the Bengals being able to make the Super Bowl.&nbsp; And what great insight to say the Browns simply need more defense.&nbsp; Why aren&#8217;t we getting paid to only say that?</p>
<p>Say the Vikings did land Derek Anderson and drafted a WR ready to make an impact.&nbsp; I&#8217;d have half a mind to start predicting a Super Bowl.&nbsp; The Bengals are a complete mess and, while we&#8217;re at it, the Ravens are as well.&nbsp; And I will revel in every second of their misery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rick@waitingfornextyear</title>
		<link>http://dawgpounddaily.com/2008/02/13/the-browns-in-tampa-next-february/comment-page-1/#comment-222</link>
		<dc:creator>rick@waitingfornextyear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 21:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dawgpounddaily.com/2008/02/13/the-browns-in-tampa-next-february/#comment-222</guid>
		<description>Wow was that a terrible article. (Not yours but Sportsline&#039;s.) So, let me get this straight. According to that article the Bengals have a chance to make the Super Bowl, but only with a &quot;major makeover&quot;...yet the Vikings don&#039;t have a chance because the passing game isn&#039;t there yet? What if the Vikings managed to get Derek Anderson and grabbed a WR in the draft that made an impact? That seems more plausible than the Bengals righting the ship...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow was that a terrible article. (Not yours but Sportsline&#8217;s.) So, let me get this straight. According to that article the Bengals have a chance to make the Super Bowl, but only with a &quot;major makeover&quot;&#8230;yet the Vikings don&#8217;t have a chance because the passing game isn&#8217;t there yet? What if the Vikings managed to get Derek Anderson and grabbed a WR in the draft that made an impact? That seems more plausible than the Bengals righting the ship&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
