<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Browns Get The Royal Treatment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dawgpounddaily.com/2009/03/04/browns-get-the-royal-treatment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dawgpounddaily.com/2009/03/04/browns-get-the-royal-treatment/</link>
	<description>A Cleveland Browns Fan Site - News, Blogs, Opinion and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:51:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: clayton</title>
		<link>http://dawgpounddaily.com/2009/03/04/browns-get-the-royal-treatment/comment-page-1/#comment-472</link>
		<dc:creator>clayton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 19:32:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dawgpounddaily.com/?p=683#comment-472</guid>
		<description>Where do you get 30 catches for Royal?  He had 81 catches in 3 yrs.  Four fumbles means he holds on more than 80 percent of the time. He fumbles less than once every 20 catches. That&#039;s better than a lot of wide receivers in the NFL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where do you get 30 catches for Royal?  He had 81 catches in 3 yrs.  Four fumbles means he holds on more than 80 percent of the time. He fumbles less than once every 20 catches. That&#8217;s better than a lot of wide receivers in the NFL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: draftguru</title>
		<link>http://dawgpounddaily.com/2009/03/04/browns-get-the-royal-treatment/comment-page-1/#comment-471</link>
		<dc:creator>draftguru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 05:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dawgpounddaily.com/?p=683#comment-471</guid>
		<description>Very true as for adding depth, but thats the only thing I would say it&#039;s good for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very true as for adding depth, but thats the only thing I would say it&#8217;s good for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stevedimatteo</title>
		<link>http://dawgpounddaily.com/2009/03/04/browns-get-the-royal-treatment/comment-page-1/#comment-468</link>
		<dc:creator>stevedimatteo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 23:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dawgpounddaily.com/?p=683#comment-468</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m just as skeptical as you draftguru, and I remember hearing the reports out of Buffalo the last few seasons that the Bills were looking to draft a better tight end.  But at the same time, I have to agree a bit with Clayton, as this is a move good for the depth of the position.

As far as the wide receivers are concerned, the current situation at the position alone should pretty much put to rest rumors of Edwards being traded.  I don&#039;t think Michael Crabtree is completely out of the question...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m just as skeptical as you draftguru, and I remember hearing the reports out of Buffalo the last few seasons that the Bills were looking to draft a better tight end.  But at the same time, I have to agree a bit with Clayton, as this is a move good for the depth of the position.</p>
<p>As far as the wide receivers are concerned, the current situation at the position alone should pretty much put to rest rumors of Edwards being traded.  I don&#8217;t think Michael Crabtree is completely out of the question&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

