Skip to main content

One sentence perfectly sums up the Browns' biggest problem (but there's more to it)

It's the same thing all over again.
Cleveland Browns quarterback Deshaun Watson (4) during minicamp.
Cleveland Browns quarterback Deshaun Watson (4) during minicamp. | IMAGN IMAGES via Reuters Connect

For the first time in years, there seem to be more reasons for excitement than despair in Berea. The new-look Cleveland Browns are oozing with young talent and have a head coach in Todd Monken who cares about accountability and execution.

The defense is still firing on all cylinders, the rookies look far ahead of schedule, and a new, more exciting offense should help this team climb the ladder after two disappointing seasons.

However, the lone concern that still lingers might be big enough to outweigh everything else.

Once again, the Browns' quarterback situation is a talking point for all the wrong reasons. And as optimistic as the fans and the media want to be, NFL Spin Zone's Lou Scataglia may have summed it up with a blunt, harsh, but probably accurate sentence:

"They might have one of the worst QB rooms we've seen this century.”

The Browns' quarterback problem isn't going away anytime soon

To be fair, that's probably hyperbole. This might not even be the worst Browns quarterback room in the past couple of years. The bottom line is that this isn't an encouraging picture.

We've heard positive updates about Shedeur Sanders' accuracy, processing ability, and overall footwork and mechanics. He's young and has his best years ahead of him, and while he still has a long way to go, he's making strides after an underwhelming rookie season.

That said, the Browns would probably have shut down any notion of Deshaun Watson also being in the running to start if they were sold on Sanders. Watson's chances are an indictment of Sanders' potential as a franchise quarterback.

Even so, this team had multiple opportunities to address the QB position this offseason and didn't. They weren't interested in Malik Willis or Kyler Murray, didn't try to trade for Mac Jones, and only added one external player — a Day 3 rookie in Taylen Green, who's more of a developmental prospect. So it's possible the Browns truly believe that Watson and Sanders were their best options for 2026.

Nonetheless, there's more to the story.

This year might be different in Cleveland

Yes, the quarterback is the most important position in team sports. Yes, the Browns' quarterback situation looks bad right now. Yes, they don't even have a starting quarterback. That part has been much discussed and well documented.

This time, however, whoever wins the battle will be in a much better position than most of his predecessors.

The Browns have a clear breakout candidate in wide receiver Denzel Boston, who's been one of the stars of training camp. They also have a big-play threat in KC Concepcion, a natural playmaker who seems to be putting drop concerns behind him.

This team also has two returning studs in Harold Fannin Jr. and Quinshon Judkins. The former was a quarterback-proof YAC specialist as a rookie, and the latter has drawn rave reviews with his explosiveness in training camp.

The offensive line should also be better. For starters, they will be healthy, which is a big improvement from whatever happened last year. It might take a while for them to mesh together, but it's hard to believe they'll be as bad as in 2025.

Todd Monken brings some much-needed juice to the table. His offenses have thrived at every level, and he's adapted his system to his personnel at every stop, not the other way around. If someone can make something out of nothing, that's him.

For the first time in a while, this team might actually keep defenses guessing. Scheming, play-calling, and mixing things up will make life easier for either of the two underwhelming options at quarterback.

Granted, Watson and Sanders have both looked terrible at times, but context is needed. Former head coach Kevin Stefanski's play-calling kept them on a leash, the offensive line couldn't stay healthy, the running game was non-existent, and they didn't have anyone to throw the ball to.

Now, they'll have a strong running game to lean on, an improved pass-blocking unit to keep a clean pocket, and a savvy play-caller who's been tormenting the AFC North for years. It's a much better setting, and while this might be wishful thinking, it may also yield better results.

It's impossible to ignore the quarterback conundrum. Cleveland's signal-caller of the future most likely isn't on the roster.

But if everything else around the quarterbacks works, things may not be as bad after all.

Add us as a preferred source on Google

Loading recommendations... Please wait while we load personalized content recommendations